Thursday, April 17, 2025

Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar Questions Absence of FIR in Justice Varma’s Cash Discovery Case

Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar on Thursday raised serious concerns about the lack of an FIR in the ongoing case involving the discovery of large sums of cash from the residence of Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Varma. The cash was allegedly found in March, after fire officials were called to the judge’s house during Holi celebrations to address a blaze. Dhankhar criticized the pace of the investigation, highlighting that if the case involved an ordinary citizen, the investigation would have proceeded swiftly.

Mamata Banerjee’s Request to Delay Governor’s Murshidabad Visit Denied

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday urged Governor CV Ananda Bose to postpone his planned visit to Murshidabad, a district in the state recently rocked by communal clashes. The violence, which erupted following the introduction of the newly enacted Waqf Amendment Act, led to the deaths of three people and left several others injured.

Dhaka Halts Indian Yarn Imports Before Delhi Cancels Trans-Shipment Facility

In a significant shift in trade relations, India on Thursday announced the end of an arrangement allowing the trans-shipment of Bangladeshi export cargo to third countries through Indian ports and airports. This decision comes as a response to a series of trade measures by Bangladesh, including the suspension of yarn imports from India and the closure of three land ports along the India-Bangladesh border.

UP Police Error: Judge Named as Accused in Theft Case, Cop Suspended

Latest newsUP Police Error: Judge Named as Accused in Theft Case, Cop Suspended

In a bizarre case of administrative oversight, a police sub-inspector in Firozabad has been suspended after he mistakenly named a judge as the accused in a theft case warrant. The incident has sparked a judicial inquiry and raised concerns over procedural lapses within the police department.

The blunder occurred when Sub-Inspector Banwari Lal, posted at Thana Uttar, was executing a court order for a non-bailable warrant. The warrant was meant for an individual named Rajkumar, who is facing theft charges. However, instead of naming the actual accused, the sub-inspector listed Judicial Magistrate Nagma Khan—the very judge who had issued the order—in the report.

To make matters worse, the report submitted by the officer stated that the “accused” (referring to the judge, due to the error) was not found at the location.

The glaring mistake shocked the judiciary and prompted immediate action. Upon learning of the incident, Judge Nagma Khan called for an inquiry into what she termed a “grave” error, underlining the seriousness of the mix-up.

Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Saurabh took swift action and ordered the sub-inspector to be transferred to the police lines. He also initiated an internal inquiry to determine how such a significant mistake could have been made and to prevent similar errors in the future.

“This is a grave clerical error, and accountability will be ensured,” the SSP stated.

The incident has drawn attention to the need for greater diligence and verification in police paperwork, especially when it concerns judicial orders. Legal experts have pointed out that such errors can not only embarrass institutions but also compromise the integrity of ongoing cases.

As the inquiry proceeds, authorities are expected to review protocols and training to ensure that such lapses do not recur.

Sources By Agencies

Check out our other content

Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles